Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers
Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, but response is cursory, ambiguous, or lacking necessary detail
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not identify and describe the institution where the new program would be implemented
Needs Assessment: Potential
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses the organizational design for potential program development
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses the organizational design for potential program development, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess the organizational design for potential program development
Needs Assessment: Disparities
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess community needs in terms of healthcare disparities
Needs Assessment: Cultural Competence
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit
Needs Assessment: Strategy
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Recommends an appropriate and logical programmatic strategy, based on results of assessments
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Recommends a programmatic strategy, but strategy is inappropriate or illogical or is not based on results of assessments
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not recommend a programmatic strategy
Needs Assessment: Alignment
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Logically assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines, but assessment is cursory, vague, or illogical
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not assess programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines
Outcomes: Anticipated Outcomes
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization, but response is cursory or vague
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not articulate the anticipated end result and does not explain how the program will produce results for the organization
Outcomes: Fit
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization
Points:
4.73 (6.3%)
Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization, but response is cursory, vague, or illogical
Points:
0 (0%)
Does not describe how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization
Outcomes: Other Areas
Points:
6.75 (9%)
Assesses the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community, explaining why
. .
The post Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers appeared first on My Nursing Paper.