Do you think the federal government has improved its response posture since 9/11?

can help me to finish this assignment with good quality and be on time please?

Please follow the instructor carefully. You are expected to post a primary response to the 2 discussions topic. All posts should address the discussion topic/question, add to the discussion, and/or encourage others to respond. Facts and claims MUST be supported with APA format citations and references. Your primary response to the topic/questions posed should be 2 paragraphs for each question, and be thoughtful, well-written, and include appropriate APA in-text citation(s) and reference(s) when appropriate.

Discussion one,

Discussion two,

· Do you think the federal government has improved its response posture since 9/11?

· Has it improved Since Katrina?

· What made Katrina so different?

Drawing from the required readings, as well as your own personal and/or professional health-related experiences, what are the pros and cons for conducting program evaluation?

Health Promotion

Previous Next

Your comments will be graded on how well they meet the Discussion Requirements posted under “Before You Begin.”

Module 4 discusses the importance of program evaluation. Drawing from the required readings, as well as your own personal and/or professional health-related experiences, what are the pros and cons for conducting program evaluation?

Drawing from your module readings, as well as your personal/professional experiences, evaluate and discuss the effectiveness of utilizing comprehensive strategies in decreasing tobacco use and increasing physical activity. of Program Planners and Policy Makers in Health Promotion

Previous Next

Your comments will be graded on how well they meet the Discussion Requirements posted under “Before You Begin.”

Module 4 discusses the importance of program evaluation. Drawing from the required readings, as well as your own personal and/or professional health-related experiences, what are the pros and cons for conducting program evaluation?

Drawing from your module readings, as well as your personal/professional experiences, evaluate and discuss the effectiveness of utilizing comprehensive strategies in decreasing tobacco use and increasing physical activity.

Discuss whether you agree or disagree with the findings that community-wide campaign strategies are effective in increasing physical activity and improving physical fitness among adults and children.

Module 4 – Case

HEALTH BEHAVIOR: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Case Assignment

The Task Force on Community Preventive Services recommends community-wide campaigns strategy to be effective in increasing physical activity and improving physical fitness among adults and children. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss your position in a 3-page paper.

The following items in particular will be assessed:

Discuss whether you agree or disagree with the findings that community-wide campaign strategies are effective in increasing physical activity and improving physical fitness among adults and children.

Defend your position by providing empirical evidence.

Based on your required readings and your own research, what strategies do you think are effective in increasing and maintaining a healthy, active lifestyle?

Assignment Expectations

Assessment and Grading: Your paper will be assessed based on the performance assessment rubric. You can view it under Assessments at the top of the page. Review it before you begin working on the assignment. Your work should also follow these Assignment Expectations.

Describe the problem health behavior and the target population.

HEALTH BEHAVIOR: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By now if you put together your SLP papers from Module 1 – 3, you have a program/intervention proposal to address a health behavior problem. Carefully read through your SLP papers from Modules 1 through 3.

Write an abstract (1 page in length) briefly describing your whole proposal. Be sure to use subheadings.

The following items will be assessed in particular:

Describe the problem health behavior and the target population.

Summary of the program goal and objectives.

Briefly describe your strategies for program implementation and evaluation.

Discuss what contribution the results/findings from your proposed program will make to the field of health sciences.

SLP Assignment Expectations

Assessment and Grading: Your paper will be assessed based on the performance assessment rubric. You can view it under Assessments at the top of the page. Review it before you begin working on the assignment. Your work should also follow these Assignment Expectations

What is the importance of these concepts to public health?

For this reflective discussion: Reflect upon two concepts that you learned in this course.

What are the concepts? What insight or ideas did you gain from learning each of these concepts? Were there aspects of the concepts that you would challenge?

What is the importance of these concepts to public health? How will you use this new wisdom in your current or future career?

Optional: Offer feedback on how the course and/or facilitation of the course can be improved.

Reflection is a mental process that challenges you to use critical thinking to examine the course information, analyze it carefully, make connections with previous knowledge and experience, and draw conclusions based on the resulting ideas. A well-cultivated critical thinker raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely; gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively; comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards; thinks open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems. (Paul & Elder, 2008)

In order to earn maximum credit, the comment should be more than your opinion, and more than a quick “off the top of your head” response. Be sure to support your statements, cite sources properly, cite within the text of your comments, and list your reference(s). The response must be a minimum of 250 words.

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (February 2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice.

Collaborative identification and interpretation of practice problems is a requirement of professional practice (AACN, 2008). Locating and summarizing literature using credible online databases is necessary for evidence-based nursing (AACN, 2008; QSEN, 2018).

Purpose

This assignment provides a learning activity for students to experience a practice-based scenario and apply a process worksheet designed to assist in the identification of an independent nursing problem or concern, develop a PICOT clinical question, and search for evidence using credible online databases/sources.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 & 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 & 8)

Due Date

Submit the completed PPL Worksheet by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3.

Points

This assignment is worth 175 points.

Directions

Read over each of the following directions.

You must read the Assignment Practice Scenario below before completing the PPL Worksheet.

Download and use the required PPL Worksheet (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Review the information provided in our library of how to search for journal articles here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Review the information provided in our library of how to locate and copy a journal permalink (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Click on the envelope at the top of the page.

Complete each section of the Problem/PICOT/Literature (PPL) Worksheet. For the Clinical PICOT Question, you are required to use one type of question from the American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing (AAACN). Please access the template to select the question type from the following link:

American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing (AAACN). (2018). AAACN research toolkit: Template for asking PICOT questions. Retrieved from https://www.aaacn.org/sites/default/files/documents/misc-docs/1e_PICOT_Questions_template.pdf (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Be sure to use the PPL grading rubric to make certain you are meeting all grading criteria of the PPL Worksheet.

Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and in-text APA formatting.

Submit the completed PPL Worksheet on the Week 3 Assignment page.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Assignment Practice Scenario

Your Chief Nurse Executive (CNE) recognizes you are pursuing your BSN and has asked you to be a member of the nursing evidence-based practice (NEBP) committee. She has advised the members that the purpose is to conduct nursing research studies involving clinical practice problems. Increasing nurses’ awareness of quality and safety concerns will help develop an attitude of inquiry and asking questions (Sherwood & Barnsteiner, 2017). Baccalaureate nurses “collaborate in problem identification, participate in the process of search, retrieval, and documentation of evidence, and integrate evidence using credible databases and internet resources” (AACN, 2008, pp. 16-17).

The CNE has advised all members of the following areas of quality and safety clinical practice that each committee member needs to consider and choose one as a priority area for conducting a research study. Sources of research problems come from nursing clinical practice (Houser, 2018):

QualitySafetyPatient satisfaction

Patient educationFallsNon-pharmacological pain managementErrors (any). Examples include:

Medication

Patient identification

Communication

Readmissions

Length of stay

CostsHealthcare Associated Infections (HAIs). (Any type)

Examples include:

Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSI)

Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

Surgical Site Infections (SSI)

SepsisDischarge Teaching/Coaching

Transitions of Care/Level of CarePressure Ulcers

Skin Integrity

Your CNE has requested that you are to select one area and complete the PPL Worksheet using that topic. The committee will collaborate and decide as a team which nursing clinical problem area will be the priority focus of their next research study. Thank you for your valuable contributions to this important NEBP committee.

References

American Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN). (2008). Executive summary: The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice (2008). Retrieved from http://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials

Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Sherwood, G., & Barnsteiner, J. (2017). Quality and safety in nursing: A competency approach to improving outcomes (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2018). QSEN knowledge, skills, and attitude competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/

Rubric

NR439 PPL Worksheet RubricNR439 PPL Worksheet RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Nursing Practice ProblemIdentify one quality or safety clinical priority area from the assignment guidelines practice scenario. Summarize the independent clinical nursing practice problem/issue you believe is the most important. Summarize your rationale (why) for choosing the problem.25.0 ptsClearly identifies one quality and safety clinical priority practice problem from the assignment guidelines practice scenario. Thoroughly summarizes the importance of the problem/issue. Thoroughly summarizes the rationale (why) the problem was chosen.22.0 ptsCriteria from the first column are mostly summarized or one criteria lacks details or is missing.20.0 ptsCriteria from the first column are minimally summarized or two criteria lack details or are not present.10.0 ptsCriteria from the first column are poorly summarized.0.0 ptsCriteria are not discussed.25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical PICOT QuestionUsing the AAACN Template for Asking PICOT Questions located in the assignment guidelines, write out your PICOT question. You must use one type of question from the AAACN template.20.0 ptsPICOT question with all 5 elements correct.18.0 ptsPICOT question with 4 elements correct.16.0 ptsPICOT question with 3 elements correct.8.0 ptsPICOT question with 1-2 elements correct.0.0 ptsPICOT question with no elements correct or no PICOT question present.20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT ElementsIdentify each of the elements for your PICOT.20.0 ptsAll 5 PICOT elements are correctly identified.18.0 pts4 PICOT elements are correctly identified.16.0 pts3 PICOT elements are correctly identified.8.0 pts1-2 PICOT elements are correctly identified.0.0 ptsNo PICOT elements are correctly identified or are not present.20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Retrieval ProcessUsing the Chamberlain College of Nursing library, locate an original nursing report/article of a single nursing study published from a nursing source/journal within the last 10 years that is relevant to your chosen clinical nursing practice problem/issue. Provide a complete APA reference to the study and the permalink. *Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis, Systematic Reviews should not be used.20.0 ptsAll of the five criteria are present or one criteria is missing: 1. Complete study reference is provided in APA. 2. Uses the Chamberlain College of Nursing library by providing the permalink for the study. 3. Study is less than 10 years old. 4. Single original nursing study. 5. Study is from a nursing source/journal *Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis, Systematic Reviews should not be used.18.0 ptsMissing two criteria from the A column.16.0 ptsMissing three criteria from the A column8.0 ptsMissing four criteria from the A column.0.0 ptsMissing all five criteria from the A column or none of the criteria are present.20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications of Literature EvidenceSummarizes how the study is relevant to your chosen clinical nursing practice problem/issue. Summarizes why you believe the nursing evidence-based practice committee should focus their next research study on this practice problem.25.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes how the study is relevant to your chosen clinical nursing practice problem/issue. Thoroughly summarizes why you believe the nursing evidence-based practice committee should focus their next research study on this practice problem. Excellent details provided.22.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.20.0 ptsFairly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.10.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Poor details are provided.0.0 ptsCriteria are not summarized or is missing.25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Search TermsIdentifies 4 (or more) relevant searchable terms you used for your search for literature.25.0 ptsIdentifies 4 (or more) relevant searchable terms used for the search for literature.22.0 ptsIdentifies 3 relevant searchable terms used for the search for literature.20.0 ptsIdentifies 2 relevant searchable terms used for the search for literature.10.0 ptsIdentifies 1 relevant searchable term used for the search for literature.0.0 ptsNo Marks25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Search StrategiesIdentifies 4 (or more) relevant search strategies you used to narrow/limit your search for literature.25.0 ptsIdentifies 4 (or more) relevant strategies used to narrow/limit the search for literature.22.0 ptsIdentifies 3 relevant strategies used to narrow/limit the search for literature.20.0 ptsIdentifies 2 relevant strategies used to narrow/limit the search for literature.10.0 ptsIdentifies 1 relevant strategy used to narrow/limit the search for literature.0.0 ptsNo strategies identified or strategies are not present.25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar8.0 ptsExcellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. 1-2 errors noted.6.0 ptsGood writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.3.0 ptsFair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.2.0 ptsPoor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.8.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences7.0 ptsExcellent APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with no errors.6.0 ptsGood APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.4.0 ptsFair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.3.0 ptsPoor APA formatting with many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor APA with errors noted throughout.7.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssigned PPL Worksheet Used0.0 ptsAssigned PICOT Worksheet form NOT used for this assignment results in loss of 10% (17.5 points) from points possible. 17.5 points deducted0.0 ptsAssigned PICOT Worksheet form used for this assignment. 0 points deducted0.0 pts

Consider looking at federal, state, and local organizations.

In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250-word essay describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

Select an issue from the following list: nursing shortage and nurse turn-over, nurse staffing ratios, unit closures and restructuring, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), continuous quality improvement and patient satisfaction, and magnet designation.

Compare and contrast how you would expect nursing leaders and managers to approach your selected issue. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings.

Identify the approach that best fits your personal and professional philosophy of nursing and explain why the approach is suited to your personal leadership style.

Identify a possible funding source that addresses your issue. Consider looking at federal, state, and local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc.

Use at least two references other than your text and those provided in the course.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Identify potential stakeholders and/or constituents who may support your health policy brief

Assignment 1

Health Policy Brief Part I

This assignment is one of three papers that will be developed throughout the Policy, Advocacy, and Healthcare Ethics course. The purpose of this assignment is to draft a health policy brief for stakeholders and community members. In other words, you will identify a relevant health-related issue impacting populations and/or communities in the United States that has legislative and policy implications at the state and/or national level. The assignment is not about identifying a policy or procedure at your place of employment, but rather identifying a systematic healthcare concern that has legislative and policy implications at least at the state level. Sample issues may be identified in your state legislative website, board of nursing website, or national association website. Also, your textbook addresses systematic issues such as smoking during pregnancy, medical cannabis use, and patient safety outcomes, to name a few. Prior to beginning to work on this project, please view the 18:36 minute video developed by the Women’s and Children’s Health Policy Center titled, The Art and Craft of Policy Briefs: Translating Science and Engaging Stakeholders, which will provide you with an understanding on the development of a policy brief.

Submission Parameters:

For the first part of this three-paper assignment, please use the following guidelines and criteria. Also, please refer to the rubric for point allocation and assignment expectations. The expected length of the paper is approximately 5-6 pages, which does not include the cover page and reference page(s).

I. Introduction (including purpose statement)

II. Identify and describe a specific and relevant healthcare issue

Please identify an issue that has state and/or national legislative implications

Describe the healthcare issue with the support of research studies, bills that have been introduced to the legislature, national association position statements, and reliable electronic health-related sources (i.e. Institute of Medicine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Include information on the demographic impacted by the issue, adverse health/clinical outcomes, and prevalence.

III. Identify potential stakeholders and/or constituents who may support your health policy brief. For example, you may address the individuals, communities, and/or populations who may be impacted by the issue.

IV. Identify at least one specific piece of legislation (bill) that is pending on your healthcare issue. Also, please identify if this piece of legislation is sponsored by the state or at the national level. Many times, bills are supported by national organizations such as the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. If your state legislature is not proposing a bill on your specific topic, you may identify a bill from another state for this paper. Make sure that you provide in-text citations and reference the document.

V. Draft a plan for your Health Policy Brief, which may capitalize from an existing health campaign and/or proposed bill. Include at least two objectives that you hope to achieve. The plan should seek to create a new policy or change an existing policy at the state and/or national level. The plan should be described in no more than 2 paragraphs.

VI. Conclusion

What aspects were you most satisfied/least satisfied with?

Briefly summarize your project: How was the assessment completed? Who was your target audience( patient at the rehabilitation) and how many were in the audience? What was your topic?( fall prevention) How did you determine what your topic should be (justification)? When( march 1st 2019) and where( sava senior care, Glenburnie MD). did you present the community education project? Who gave you permission to present at the location,( Ms Carol Brown) was the permission form completed? yes. How did you advertise your presentation? ( nurses, patient tech, physical therapist and occupational therapist) What educational materials did you use or provide to the audience? (Provide ID of yourself and action picture for proof)

Evaluation

Explain how you would evaluate whether the efforts to improve the health concern were effective. Include in your explanation the tools you might use to do this evaluation. Also, critically appraise your performance of the activity/project for this population. How did the population respond? What aspects were you most satisfied/least satisfied with? What went well (at least 3 things)? What changes would you make in the future (at least 2 things)?

Conclusion

For nurses, reflection is integral to higher-level thinking. You should be able to critically analyze scenarios and possible outcomes as opposed to simply asking the right questions. Acute perception of the entire situation will be obtained because you are open to dealing with the contradictions that may challenge your initial bias. Reflect on how your perspective of the community’s health and the national, state, and local efforts toward a healthier population has changed as a result of your fieldwork. Discuss the health of the target community population compared to national, state, local health findings. Discuss how the interventions used would impact at the local, state, and national level (include information on your chosen Healthy People 2020 goals). Finally, what impact did your project have on your target population?

Please submit a recorded presentation of between 7 and 9 minutes that is a reflection of the project based on a full representation of all three parts above. You may video yourself discussing the project or you may create a PowerPoint presentation and record your voice to the presentation (using screencast-o-matic.com). The presentation should include at least two scholarly sources other than provided materials. Please be sure to provide a photo of you at the location where you completed your education project and your ID again. You may submit your Reference page and photos in a separate file in the dropbox or insert them into the PowerPoint.

Please also submit your final Project Hours Log with a total of between 70 and 100 hours. The module hour breakdown is as follows: